35

I do not consider this answer acceptable because it violates be nice, in particular: Be welcoming, be patient, and assume good intentions. Don't be a jerk. These are just a few examples. If you see them, flag them: […] Harassment and bullying. If you see a hostile interaction, flag it. Threatening or scaring users, in particular with consequences ...


14

The threats were inappropriate and definitely a violation of our be nice policy. I have deleted the answer. If a 10k+ user thinks they can salvage the answer, please edit and flag for attention so it can be undeleted.


14

I usually don't post these Welcome messages because, well, I see no real purpose to them, and if there is a policy to post them always, the entire exercise becomes incredibly fake and dishonest fast. I have no quarrels with a policy of always welcoming new users, but frankly I remain unconvinced that this will make new users somehow feel more at home more ...


13

Setting aside the other issues here, abusive and discourteous treatment of other users on this site will not be tolerated. I personally would want to be treated with respect, and that courtesy should be extended to others. If one can't make your point without belittling other members of the community, then one should find alternate communities which may ...


11

In general, I agree with the Massimo’s and Sascha’s answers that such questions should stay as long as they can be sufficiently anonymised. They can help others in similar situations and as long as the personal links are borrowed in some edit history (and stay civil), we do not leave the impression of being a place for public accusations – which I consider ...


10

However unpleasant they are, I think we should deal with such kind of questions. For two reasons. It can be challenging to write one, but a balanced or straight answer to a thorny question can be extremely helpful to the asker and to future visitors. And I think that our community has certainly a number of people capable of giving good advice even in such ...


10

I usually welcome the OP if I have something to say in the comment. But I guess it's to everyone's taste. If this is to become a trend then the only annoyance would be skipping one more line of comments, which is not a big deal. There are a few thoughts: Most of the time when I see those "welcome" comments they are from users with, say, around 100-200 ...


10

So long as the paper and the link coherently fit into your answer, as well as the topic of the question, I don't see a problem with this. You can make a disclaimer if you want, and I think that would satisfy any concerns.


10

I normally (on all SE sites), post welcome messages of the form. "Welcome to X.SE. Your question is a bit too Y for our format. You could improve it by doing Z." The welcome message is not there to welcome them, but to soften the blow when giving (constructive) criticism. So as not to drive the new user away, while they are still learning the ropes.


9

To answer your questions, I would say (1) no, (2) definitely not, and (3) VERY definitely not. You can peruse the on-topic and off-topic FAQ sections to see what we look for in questions. We definitely don't want anyone to publicly call anyone else out. We are a community where you can seek advice, but we cannot take any action... we're just strangers on ...


9

The whole point of ads on this site is to allow the community to advertise what they, collectively, find useful and relevant. I disagree with your "low vote threshold" comment... the ten-vote threshold on meta for a site like ours is a pretty steep requirement, as the vast majority of our users don't visit meta, ever. For an ad to have accumulated ten votes ...


8

And why does Academia seem to give it free reign? Bashing other disciplines is clearly against our code of conduct and I do not have the impression that it happens often. If you see any posts that do this, please flag them as rude or abusive (questions and answers) or harassment, bigotry or abuse (comments). If you think that the rudeness is not obvious, ...


7

Yes, this question IMHO escalated quickly, and is certainly not the best showcase of the academia.SE community. Clearly, mistakes have been made, both by the OP and some of our community members - from the OP's knee-jerk follow-up comments and edits to EnergyNumber's very derogatory answer (which I downvoted). I originally also wanted to provide an answer ...


7

I think welcoming new users with a comment is fine. I think it is also fine to flag welcome comments as "too chatty" a few days later. At that point the comment has served most of its purpose (i.e., welcoming the new user). I guess the argument for keeping it longer, is to let other new users know we are welcoming. I tend to only welcome new users when I ...


7

Yes, you should read through the answers that have already been posted, as an answer that largely duplicates someone else's answer might otherwise be flagged for plagiarism. You should post a new answer when you have something new to contribute to the question at hand. Just reposting the same information under the claim of having more expertise is a waste of ...


6

I vote to delete this question. I agree with Sascha In the meantime, it becomes IMHO more and more clear that the guy is a fraud, and not just deluded. My answer isn't meant to help this guy, but to show his false accusations. I guess he just wants to be famous by public shaming other people.


6

Read Welcome to Academia.SE. Read What topics can I ask about here? in the help center.


6

Some kinds of targeted voting are detected automatically and reversed by the system (see this Meta post). In other cases, where it isn't the kind of pattern that is automatically detected, moderators can ask a Stack Exchange employee to take a closer look at a voting pattern. I have just done this for you. If there is targeted voting going on, they'll ...


6

Targeted voting, whether up or down, is against SE community guidelines and, when detected, generally reversed.


5

I tend to prefer them being put in the same answer using headers or bullet points or something to distinguish them for a few reasons: Two 50-point answers does not a gold badge make ;) If you provide two excellent answers, it removes any conflict about which one to accept as "the" answer It keeps your two-part answer together, so that variation in voting ...


4

This question and this answer are my way of trying to encourage more of this sort of thing. Posters with sufficient reputation could, as well as being nice, be a little more vigorous in casting down votes for obviously bad questions; casting close votes for closable questions; and in the list of closed non-duplicate questions, either voting to delete, or ...


3

I wondered about the same thing regarding this question. I would leave it open: It could be that the person asking is really severely deluded. While I thing that the answers may or may not be helping him to understand that, there is a chance that they do The question in itself is not a bad one - I had an (much more specific) idea in a research proposal ...


2

The OP is at this point clearly showing that he has a highly distorted and false world view of the effort involved in research leading to a successful publication. He is attacking with a religious zeal to convince others that he is under all manner of professional and personal persecution. No answer will be marked as one that correctly addresses his starting ...


2

My own suggested guidelines are (a) to check whether a style is your own preference, or seems to be used very widely on Academia.SE, and (b) to check the impact of the edit. 1. Style that is used consistently by many long-term users of the site This category has two sub-categories: 1.1 If the edit makes a big difference to readability of post, or ...


2

To me the best ads are for web resources which I would want to visit many times. This means that I think "product" ads (e.g., the one for Zotero) and "political" ads (e.g., the one for the Elsevier Boycott) are not particularly useful. The issue is the static and one-off nature of the material. Having ads be to unchanging webpages (e.g., political blog posts,...


1

You should create one new post, and post the second question there. Then flag the first question for moderator attention so we can reopen it.


1

In hindsight, there is a fundamental problem with the question, in that the top-level question and the body subject ask two fundamentally different questions. I responded to the top-level question, rather than the questions posed in the body. The most equitable solution right now, I think, would be to split the question in two.


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible