3 of 5 added one example

In general, I like shape of Academia.SE. And I am still being surprised, that with so many subjective questions, this site is a nice resource.

However, in my personal opinion:

  • Too much of life-story/life-choices/coaching/etc
  • Too much of soft answers
    • I mean, if someone asks a question about chances of being admitted somewhere (or anything else) I think that we, as the community, should put more value on at least trying to use any data, objective references, links to other materials, etc. Sure, sometimes answer is "yes" (or "no"), which is obvious for any insider; but it many cases it isn't.
    • example:

IMHO we should have much stricter comments and moderation for questions:

  • capturing one's life story,
  • asking a few questions at the same time,
  • too long (IMHO they can be as long as one wishes, but the question, or the overview, should in in the first paragraphs).

And for answers (just comment-bugging may suffice), when:

  • it seems that some data, research papers or essays can be linked,
  • the answer seems to be specific for a given region or discipline.

(And less strict for the comments :).)