I just noticed that there are two highly similar but distinct tags on the main site:

  1. , which has 893 questions, and , , and as synonyms.
  2. , which has 25 questions, no tag description, and no synonyms.

Since is a synonym of , I think that either:

  1. should be made a synonym of (this seems most appropriate); or
  2. and should be made synonyms of each other, with neither being a synonym of .

1 Answer 1


Yes, your option 1 seems the most appropriate. Here, questions about co-authors are essentially questions about authorship, and I can hardly see a description of sufficiently different from that of : I would thus consider 2 not a good option.

Moreover, the description of already explicitly mentions problems of co-authorship:

Queries related to academic authorship, i.e., who should be an author, the order of authors, or special roles such as corresponding authorship.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .