0

By reading the tag excerpt about ;

The perception of the quality of a journal, conference, or university by a specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation develops and factors influencing reputation.

it seems that this tag only covers questions about reputation of journals and research institutes; all but individuals. By reading a recent question about the reputation of individuals;

How to judge the reputation of a research group or professor for good quality research for PhD?

this question comes to mind that;

Does this tag cover questions about persons too?

If it should not be used, the question should be edited and if it is allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we should change this tag's excerpt.

1

I don't think that list ("journal, conference, or university") was ever meant to be exclusive.

In any event, now it reads:

The perception of the quality of a journal, conference, university, or other academic entity by a specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation develops and factors influencing reputation.

so as to not exclude questions about the reputation of: an individual, research group, department, group of universities, type of journal (e.g. open access), publisher, preprint repository, or anything else that might be relevant to academia.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .